WHAT’S HOT NOW

ads header

Business

Theme images by kelvinjay. Powered by Blogger.

Canada Reads champion and Jeopardy! superstar Mattea Roach recommends 3 'must-read' memoirs

  "Essentially, one key thing to know about Joan Didion is not only did she live most of her life in California, but she was a fifth-ge...

Contact form

Name

Email *

Message *

Search This Blog

Blog Archive

Mobile Logo Settings

Mobile Logo Settings
image

Recent

4/recentposts
[recent]

Ad Space

Responsive Advertisement

Comments

4/recentcomments

Subscribe Us

Facebook

Popular

Life & style

Games

Sports

Where did the term 'parental rights' come from?

 

A look at what the term means, where it comes from and who is included — and excluded — under its umbrella.

Protesters in Edmonton hold a parental rights sign on Wednesday. Though the phrase 'parental rights' is by no means new, it has re-emerged during recent conflicts over sexual orientation and gender identity policies in Canadian schools. (Travis McEwan/CBC)

The term "parental rights" — while by no means new — has re-emerged during recent conflicts over sexual orientation and gender identity policies in Canadian schools.

When some parents and socially conservative groups protested LGBTQ-inclusive education school policies on Wednesday across Canada, many did so under the banner of parental rights, scrawling the words on signs and invoking them in speeches.

It's especially come up in relation to policies that let LGBTQ kids change their name or pronouns without requiring schools to inform their parents. Saskatchewan and New Brunswick recently introduced policies that would require parental consent for children under 16 to do so, and other provinces are considering doing the same.

"I believe in parental rights, and parental rights come before the government's rights," Conservative Party Leader Pierre Poilievre said during a recent interview with a Mississauga, Ont., news station. 

Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe and Manitoba Premier Heather Stefanson have also used the term in their social media posts, while New Brunswick Premier Blaine Higgs kept his message focused on parental rights while greeting protesters, but not counter-demonstrators at Wednesday's March.

So what does "parental rights" mean, where does the phrase come from and who is included — and excluded — under its umbrella?

Critics call phrase a misnomer

Those who are critical of the term say it's a misnomer that excludes LGBTQ parents or parents of LGBTQ children, and implies that parental rights take precedence over children's rights.

"I think we can think of the parental rights movement as a conservative movement to limit the influence of government in people's lives generally," said Jen Gilbert, a professor at the University of Toronto's Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.

"In the case of the marches that are happening this week and and more generally around the schooling, the parental rights movement has emerged as a movement to limit discussions of sexuality and gender in schools under the auspices of both protecting children and protecting parents' rights to raise children as they see fit."

As protests and counter-protests over LGBTQ rights in schools erupted across the country this week, CBC News spoke with people who had different understandings of parental rights.

"I think it's important that we respect parental rights [and] respect parental choices," said Nathan McMillan, a protester in Toronto. "If parents feel that sex education in a particular manner is not appropriate for their child, they should absolutely have that right to have those conversations privately offline."

Shawn Rouse, the parent of a transgender child in Quispamsis, N.B., interpreted the phrase differently.

"I think a lot of people try to frame this as parental rights. That is a phrase that has been around for decades. Whenever a parent has something they don't like at a public school, they say, 'Well, I have parental rights,' " he said.

"This is nothing new. Any time that a public school curriculum decides that they are going to talk about something that a parent might not be comfortable with, there's a pushback."

The phrase has a long history in Canada that goes back to the late 19th and early 20th century, typically arising in relation to issues of language and religion in schools, according to Jason Ellis, an associate professor of education at the University of British Columbia.

"Parents expect the school, even though it's compulsory, will educate their children more or less in the way that they want them to be educated," said Ellis. 

When this unwritten contract is seen to break down, he said, "is where things tend to become very contentious."

Counter-protesters in favour of LGBTQ inclusive sex education arrived at McGill University's Roddick Gates in Montreal Wednesday morning. (Ivanoh Demers/Radio-Canada)

'None of these discussions are new'

The parental rights movement is highly active in the U.S., where hundreds of pieces of anti-transgender legislation limiting discussion of sexual identity and gender orientation in schools have been passed or introduced this year alone — and where the term has a long history.

Canada's parental rights movement shares some DNA with that of the U.S., according to Kristopher Wells, a Canada Research Chair at MacEwan University in Edmonton.

He noted that conservative Christian activist Anita Bryant toured Canadian cities with her 1970s Save Our Children campaign, which sought to overturn Miami County legislation that would end housing and employment discrimination against gay people in the name of parents' rights.

"None of these discussions are new," Wells said, noting that Alberta has often been at the forefront of the parental rights movement in Canada.

The province passed a 2009 bill that — while enshrining the rights of sexual minorities — also included a provision that would give parents the option of pulling their children out of lessons when topics related to sex, religion or sexual orientation were taught. (CBC News called it a parental rights clause at the time.)

In 2014, when the Alberta clause was debated during a party leadership forum, the phrase came up again.

The controversy over sex education in Ontario that began in 2015 was also framed as a matter of parental rights. So was a 2018 conflict over sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) curriculum in B.C. schools. And during Ontario's school board elections in 2022, many candidates ran on parental rights platforms.

Phrase adopted by wide spectrum of groups

"We live in a very connected, networked world, so ideas about the framing of parental rights travels across national borders into Canada, to the U.S., to Australia, to the U.K. and back again," said Gilbert.

Today, the phrase has been used by groups with a spectrum of political, social and religious affiliations. 

But it's also been adopted by Canadian organizations like Action4Canada, a COVID-19 conspiracy group, and groups in the U.S. like Moms For Liberty, which the Southern Poverty Law Centre lists as a hate group.

The Canadian Anti-Hate Network, a non-profit that monitors extremism in Canada, has also expressed concern about a rise in parental rights policies and how they impact trans and LGBTQ youth.

"There's something about this language of parental rights that has really caught on at this particular moment," said Gilbert. "It speaks to a lot of people's sense of disenfranchisement."

Child advocates in New Brunswick and Saskatchewan have said that parental rights policies like the ones passed in their provinces could put children in danger of being outed to parents before they're ready.

Trans youth in particular are at a significantly higher risk of suicide than their peers.

Advocates have also warned that the policies may violate international human rights agreements regarding children's own rights, as well as the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Saskatchewan Premier Moe recently said he's prepared to protect his province's rules around names and pronouns by using the notwithstanding clause, which allows a province to override parts of the Charter for up to five years.


Russia's violence 'must not go unpunished,' Zelenskyy tells Canadian parliamentarians

 

Liberals announce $650M more in military aid for Ukraine, spread over several years.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy delivers a speech in the House of Commons in Ottawa on Friday, Sept. 22, 2023. (Sean Kilpatrick/Canadian Press)

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy delivered an impassioned speech to parliamentarians Friday calling on Canada and other western allies to stick by his country through the long, bloody road to victory.

He addressed a joint meeting of the Canadian Parliament Friday following meetings in the United States, where he appealed for more weapons and rebuked Russia before the United Nations General Assembly and Security Council.

"Life and justice must prevail," Zelenskyy told the House of Commons in a speech that received at least a dozen standing ovations.

"When we call on the world to support us, it is not just about an ordinary conflict. It is about saving the lives of millions of people. Literally physical salvation, ordinary women and men, children, our families, whole communities, entire cities. Russia's destruction of Mariupol or Bakhmut or any other city must not go unpunished."

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau used the visit to announce Friday another $650 million in military aid for Ukraine, spread over three years, to acquire 50 armoured vehicles. The fleet will include medical evacuation vehicles to be built in London, Ont., he said.

The new aid package is in addition to the $500 million announced by Trudeau in June during a visit to Kyiv.

It represents a fundamental shift in the way Canada delivers war materiel. Instead of answering specific, individual requests for equipment from Ukraine, the Canadian government is anticipating its needs and planning to deliver on a sustained basis.

"History will judge us on how we defend democratic values, and Ukraine is at the tip of the spear in this great challenge of the 21st century," Trudeau told the House before introducing Zelenskyy.

"[Russian President Vladimir Putin]  governs with deception, violence and repression ... But his imperial delusions in Ukraine have been met with a fierce defence. A defence that is not just strong because of the support from friends around the world, but because those who fight for their freedom will always fight with their whole hearts."

'Ajuinnata Canada'

As Ukrainian refugees looked on from the gallery, Zelenskyy thanked Canada for its military aid so far, which has included air defence systems, armoured vehicles and artillery shells.

"Canada's support for Ukraine with weapons and equipment has allowed us to save thousands of lives," he said.

He said it's a tradition of sustained support that dates back to 1983, when the first monument in the world to honour the victims of the Holodomor — the Soviet-engineered famine that killed millions of Ukrainians in the 1930s. — was unveiled in the city of Edmonton.

"Moscow now, as always, is bent on controlling Ukraine and makes use of all available means to do that, including genocide," Zelenskyy said.

"Ukraine, not genocide, will be victorious in this war. People will be the winners, not the Kremlin."

Zelenskyy met earlier in the day with  Gov. Gen. Mary Simon. He said she taught him an Inuktitut word — "ajuinnata"

"She said the meaning of this word is, 'Don't give up ... stay strong against all odds,'" he said, ending his address to Parliament.

"And so it shall be. Ajuinnata Canada. Ajuinnata Ukraine."

New sanctions announced

After the speeches, the two countries signed a modernized trade deal meant to strengthen economic ties.

Trudeau offered more information about that $500 million aid package announced months ago. About $76 million of that package is going to supply 35 high-resolution drone cameras, while another $30 million has been earmarked for a new repair facility in Poland for Ukraine's Leopard tanks.

Canada also will send trainers for Ukrainian pilots and more small arms ammunition and has set aside more than $4 million to strengthen nuclear security measures at the Chernobyl exclusion zone.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy receives a standing ovation from Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and parliamentarians as he arrives to deliver a speech in the House of Commons in Ottawa on Friday, Sept. 22, 2023. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)

Friday's announcement brings Canada's total committed support to Ukraine to more than $9.5 billion since the beginning of 2022, according to the Prime Minister's Office.

The government unveiled new sanctions today against 63 Russian individuals and entities Trudeau said are complicit in the kidnapping of Ukrainian children and the spread of disinformation and propaganda. The sanctions also will apply to entities in Russia's nuclear sector already sanctioned by Canada's international partners.

The NDP has called Canada's sanctions regime "political theatre." RCMP data suggests few funds have been frozen or seized.

As part of Friday's announcement, Canada and Ukraine agreed to work with international partners to establish a working group "to provide advice to decision makers on the seizure and forfeiture of Russian assets, including Russian central bank assets," according to a readout from PMO.

Chillier reception in the U.S. 

Zelenskyy's visit is part of his campaign to nail down long-term support from allies.

Earlier this week, Poland's prime minister announced a halt in military donations following a trade dispute between the neighbouring countries.

And while the Biden administration in the United States remains firmly behind Ukraine, the notion of continued, open-ended support for the embattled Eastern European country is dividing the Republican Party. U.S. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy chose not to greet the Ukrainian leader before the cameras Thursday.

There has been no hint of any such political divide in Canada. Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre gave a thumbs-up to the Ukraine delegation when it arrived outside the House of Commons chamber and Zelenskyy was formally greeted by political leaders.

In a media statement, the Conservative leader said Canadians will continue to stand with Ukrainians.

"Canada should continue to help Ukrainians win their freedom, welcome Ukrainian refugees and finally begin to approve natural gas exports to break European dependence on Russia and turn dollars for dictators like Putin into paycheques for our people," he said.

"Canada should be an ethical, clean energy superpower that energizes the free world with our resources." 

Saskatchewan Sen. Denise Batters, who is of Ukrainian descent, attended the event wearing a vyshyvanka, a traditional Ukrainian embroidered blouse. She told Zelenskyy her grandmother stitched the garment more than 100 years ago before coming to Canada.

Separately, Ukraine's new Defence Minister Rustem Umerov met with his Canadian counterpart, Bill Blair, at National Defence headquarters. Blair said the government has had "outstanding" discussions with Ukraine about how Canada can help with its "valiant and courageous struggle" against Russia.

"We believe it is our responsibility and we are absolutely resolved to providing all of the assistance and support that we can for Ukraine," Blair said.

Umerov thanked Biair.

Visit comes as Ukraine reports battlefield progress

The visit happened just as reports emerged that Ukrainian forces operating near Orikhiv have penetrated the third line of Russian defences in the south of the country.

The U.S.-based Institute for the Study of War, which has been following the invasion with daily reports and analysis, hesitated to call it a breakthrough. It noted that geolocated footage posted online Thursday "indicates that Ukrainian armoured vehicles advanced south of the Russian anti-tank ditches and dragon's teeth obstacles" that form part of Russia's three defensive lines.

"The Ukrainian ability to bring armoured vehicles to and through the most formidable Russian defences intended to stop them, and to operate these vehicles near prepared Russian defensive positions, are important signs of progress in the Ukrainian counteroffensive," the institute said in its nightly analysis.

Paul Grod, president of the World Ukrainian Congress, said for Ukrainians it's not about liberating territory as much as it is about freeing people from Russian occupation.

Also on Friday, a Ukrainian missile struck the headquarters of Russia's Black Sea Fleet in Sevastopol, the major city in occupied Crimea. The attack left one serviceman unaccounted for and the building that controls Russian naval operations in ruins.

Senate's top spender defends long list of contracts for outside consultants Social Sharing

 

Manitoba senator also spent $108,082 on travel in the last year.

Manitoba Sen. Marilou McPhedran attends a parliamentary committee in April 2023. (Patrick Doyle/Canadian Press)

A non-affiliated senator from Manitoba is the biggest spender in the Red Chamber — but she defends her expenses by saying she's an active parliamentarian who needs a lot of help and wants to pay her consultants fairly.

Marilou McPhedran, named to the Senate by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in 2016, spends comparatively more than other senators to retain outside aides and consultants.

Since January 2021, McPhedran has awarded $193,881 worth of contracts to part-time and casual employees — mostly students — researchers, government relations professionals and one activist who's written about lowering the federal voting age to 16, a cause the senator has championed in recent years.

In an interview, McPhedran conceded she'd likely spend more than she does now if Senate finance officials didn't routinely deny her requests for more resources.

"I'm someone they say 'no' to a lot because they don't understand how I try to do things," she said.

"I don't do things the way most other senators have been doing it. I'm not interested in that."

McPhedran said she doesn't want to rely solely on full-time staff — she also wants outside experts to work on her various projects.

"I want to be able to create a learning environment using the resources given to me. I think that's completely within the boundaries," she said.

Manitoba Sen. Marilou McPhedran takes part in an April 2022 press conference on Parliament Hill. (Sean Kilpatrick/Canadian Press)

The Winnipeg senator is also known for spending more than her colleagues on travel. She posted trip expenses that totalled more than $54,000 for the last three months of 2022 alone, according to Senate data.

Since July 2022, McPhedran has spent $108,082 on travel.

Under the Senate's travel policy, senators are entitled to fly business class — which can lead to pricey fares paid for by taxpayers.

McPhedran's recent flight to Victoria for a conference cost more than $5,000.

While she dips into the federal treasury more often than others, McPhedran is also among the most transparent senators when it comes to financial disclosure.

'A rigorous review'

She posts a detailed statement on her Facebook page whenever there's a new expenses report published by the Senate administration.

The senator spent nearly an hour with CBC News explaining in granular detail the largest expenses she's incurred over the last two years.

All of the expenses have also been approved by Senate finance officials, a process she describes as "a rigorous review."

Sen. Marilou McPhedran arrives at a House of Commons committee meeting in April, 2023. (Patrick Doyle/Canadian Press)

In addition to her work to lower the voting age, McPhedran has been leading a push for institutional reform in the Senate, particularly on matters of harassment and abuse.

She also campaigns for safe sport and has denounced the use of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) by organizations like Hockey Canada.

Those initiatives cost money, the senator said.

Of the nearly $200,000 McPhedran's office has budgeted for contracts from January 2021 to June 2023, about $113,000 has been paid out so far, according to figures supplied by her office.

'The spending is high'

Those contract staffing costs are in addition to the salary paid to McPhedran's full-time parliamentary affairs adviser.

"Yes, the spending is high but I don't think any other senator has had 50-plus young people come through their office," she said, referring to job opportunities for young people and recent graduates.

Among the recipients of McPhedran's spending is Syntax, an Ottawa-based lobbying and communications firm that has been advising her on how best to spend the three years she has left in the Senate before mandatory retirement in July 2026. That contract is valued at $30,000.

Last year, the government accused McPhedran of distributing questionable letters to would-be Afghan refugees looking to flee that country after the Taliban takeover — a charge she strongly denies, insisting her efforts were sanctioned by the chief of staff to a federal cabinet minister.

That "nightmare," as she called it, nearly derailed her other work in the Red Chamber, McPhedran said.

Syntax has been advising her on how to recover from that experience, she said.

"I was really battered and I was sensitized to how so much of my time last year was spent just trying to respond to this cowardly act of referring the matter to the RCMP," she said.

"I sat down with Syntax and I said, 'These are the women I want to work with.' And they helped build a three-year strategic plan. I'm a feminist, activist, human rights lawyer and now senator — I'm very willing to take advice on strategic decisions."

Other senators also hire outside consultants.

Earlier this year, Conservative Sen. Elizabeth Marshall retained the firm Government Analytics for $15,000 at taxpayers' expense. Conservative Sen. Percy Mockler paid the same sum to the same company.

Kris Sims speaks for the Canadian Taxpayers' Federation, an interest group that calls for smaller government and lower spending.

'Is this really necessary?'

"Just because senators sit in the royal chamber doesn't mean they need to act like royalty," Sims told CBC News.

"The affordability crisis for working people is real. Senators need to take a hard look at their expenses right now and say, 'Is this really necessary?'"

She said McPhedran's reliance on outside consultants is "really concerning," given taxpayers already pay for a complement of nearly 500 Senate public servants.

"Taxpayers pay for every nickel of this. This isn't some magical funding pot that senators can turn to whenever they want. This costs real people real money. Some senators are getting a little too comfortable, thinking they're entitled to their entitlements and they're not," Sims said.

"Senators are there to offer sober second thought and review legislation. They're not paid to globe-trot on our dime and endlessly give contracts to outside people for their own betterment."

A spokesperson for the Senate's committee on internal economy, budgets and administration (CIBA) declined to comment on McPhedran's spending.

"Senators are responsible for their expenses and for explaining how their contracts support their parliamentary functions," Alison Korn said in a media statement.

McPhedran also has hired an Ottawa law firm — Conway Baxter Wilson LLP — at $10,000 a year to provide her with parliamentary procedural advice.

McPhedran said that as a non-affiliated senator, she doesn't enjoy some of the same privileges that Conservative, Progressive and Independent senators enjoy as members of a caucus. She said the law firm is providing her with extra support.

Dave Meslin, the creative director of Unlock Democracy Canada and the author of Teardown: Rebuilding Democracy from the Ground Up, has been contracted by McPhedran's office to deliver consultation services at about $24,000 a year. Meslin is helping the senator with her push to lower the voting age.

The other contracts include agreements to hire mostly younger workers for short periods of time to help on particular projects, McPhedran said.

She said recent graduates are sometimes exploited by their employers — or they're forced to work for no pay to gain experience.

McPhedran said she chooses to pay her younger staff, unless their work is for school credits.

She said that when she was first appointed, she promised Trudeau she would help to revitalize the Senate's image by making its work better known among young people and seeking more of their input on how government should work.

"I have a limited term as a senator — this can't end with me. Our democracy is in trouble and one of the things we need to do is revitalize it, engage with youth and actually build a movement of intergenerational leadership," McPhedran said.

"Every time I can engage a young person and help them navigate the parliamentary system and give them support and encouragement and feedback and resources, I'm investing in our democracy."

As for her travel expenses, McPhedran said she frequently engages with civil society groups that she thinks deserve face-time with a parliamentarian.

She pointed to a recent meeting with South Sudanese activists in Winnipeg who are organizing for peace.

It would be unfair to ask groups like this to cover her travel costs, she said, because they don't have a lot of money on hand.

"I see my job as being available to civil society organizations. That's my responsibility. And they would never be able to pay for me," she said.

Google accused of directing motorist to drive off collapsed bridge

 

Google accused of directing motorist to drive off collapsed bridge.

The family of a US man who drowned after driving off a collapsed bridge are claiming that he died because Google failed to update its maps.

Philip Paxson's family are suing the company over his death, alleging that Google negligently failed to show the bridge had fallen nine year earlier.

Mr Paxson died in September 2022 after attempting to drive over the damaged bridge in Hickory, North Carolina.

A spokesperson for Google said the company was reviewing the allegations.

The case was filed in civil court in Wake County on Tuesday.

Mr Paxson, a father of two, was driving home from his daughter's ninth birthday party at a friend's house and was in an unfamiliar neighbourhood at the time of his death, according to the family's lawsuit.

His wife had driven his two daughters home earlier, and he stayed behind to help clean up.

"Unfamiliar with local roads, he relied on Google Maps, expecting it would safely direct him home to his wife and daughters," lawyers for the family said in a statement announcing the lawsuit.

"Tragically, as he drove cautiously in the darkness and rain, he unsuspectingly followed Google's outdated directions to what his family later learned for nearly a decade was called the 'Bridge to Nowhere,' crashing into Snow Creek, where he drowned."

Local residents had repeatedly contacted Google to have them change their online maps after the bridge collapsed in 2013, the suit claims.


Barriers that were normally placed across the bridge entrance were missing due to vandalism, according to the Charlotte Observer.

The lawsuit is also suing three local companies, arguing they had a duty to maintain the bridge.

"Our girls ask how and why their daddy died, and I'm at a loss for words they can understand because, as an adult, I still can't understand how those responsible for the GPS directions and the bridge could have acted with so little regard for human life," his wife, Alicia Paxson, said in a statement.

"We have the deepest sympathies for the Paxson family," a spokesman for Google told AP News.

"Our goal is to provide accurate routing information in Maps and we are reviewing this lawsuit."






Poland to stop supplying weapons to Ukraine over grain row

 

Poland to stop supplying weapons to Ukraine over grain row


One of Ukraine's staunchest allies, Poland, has announced it will no longer supply weapons to the country as a diplomatic dispute over grain escalates.

The nation's prime minister said it would instead focus on arming itself with more modern weapons.

The move comes as tensions between the two nations rise.

On Tuesday, Poland summoned Ukraine's ambassador over comments made by President Volodymyr Zelensky at the UN.

He said some nations had feigned solidarity with Ukraine, which Warsaw denounced as "unjustified concerning Poland, which has supported Ukraine since the first days of the war".

Poland's prime minister, Mateusz Morawiecki, announced the decision to no longer supply Ukraine with weapons in a televised address on Wednesday after a day of rapidly escalating tensions between the two countries over grain imports.

"We are no longer transferring weapons to Ukraine, because we are now arming Poland with more modern weapons," Mr Morawiecki said.

The grain dispute began after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine all but closed the main Black Sea shipping lanes and forced Ukraine to find alternative overland routes.

That in turn led to large quantities of grain ending up in central Europe.

Consequently, the European Union temporarily banned imports of grain into five countries; Bulgaria, Hungary, Poland, Romania and Slovakia to protect local farmers, who feared Ukrainian grain was driving down the prices locally.

The ban ended on 15 September and the EU chose not to renew it, but Hungary, Slovakia and Poland decided to keep on implementing it.

The European Commission has repeatedly stated that it is not up to individual EU members to make trade policy for the bloc.

Earlier this week, Ukraine filed lawsuits to the World Trade Organisation (WTO) against those countries over the bans, which it said were a violation of international obligations.

Ukraine's Economy Minister Yulia Svyrydenko said that "it is crucially important for us to prove that individual member states cannot ban imports of Ukrainian goods".

But Poland said they would keep the ban in place, and a "complaint before the WTO doesn't impress us".

Mr Morawiecki said they would increase the number of banned products from Kyiv if Ukraine escalates the grain dispute. Poland's foreign ministry added that "putting pressure on Poland in multilateral forums or sending complaints to international courts are not appropriate methods to resolve differences between our countries".

Despite the ban, the three countries said they would still allow grain to be transported through them to other markets.

Kyiv called for Poland to "leave emotion aside" after their ambassador was summoned and instead suggested the parties should adopt a constructive approach to resolving the dispute.

The French Foreign Minister, Catherina Colonna said on Wednesday an EU study revealed Ukrainian grain imports would not cripple European farmers, and described the tensions as "regrettable".

Poland has provided much support to Ukraine as it defends itself against Russia, urging Germany to provide the country with Leopard 2 battle tanks, pledging fighter jets to the country and welcoming more than 1.5m refugees from Ukraine.